You're the only person that has claimed a role tbf, Angels will be looking for someone to save
F365 Wolfgame 32
Dang Huu Thu wrote:Im just looking forward to when the vigilante kills himself
Ong Xuan Giang wrote:Dang Huu Thu wrote:Im just looking forward to when the vigilante kills himself
Thats a thankless role really, 3 bullets but shit scared to use any of them at this stage
USA Leader will also expose himself when he uses the Air Strike, especially if 2 of the victims have 4 voters between them. The Leader must then be the player who voted immediately before the first victim, worse case scenario we can narrow him down to one of 4 possibilities.
Ly Huu Son wrote:Guys, can I have a consensus? Do you think I should reveal the two that I looked at last night and showed as good or not?
Dang Huu Thu wrote:Ong Xuan Giang wrote:Dang Huu Thu wrote:Im just looking forward to when the vigilante kills himself
Thats a thankless role really, 3 bullets but shit scared to use any of them at this stage
USA Leader will also expose himself when he uses the Air Strike, especially if 2 of the victims have 4 voters between them. The Leader must then be the player who voted immediately before the first victim, worse case scenario we can narrow him down to one of 4 possibilities.
Its a hard role tbs.
Why will the USA leader expose himself? Air support isn't called in in the thread, he can just email it in.
probably from the timestamp of email. Anyhow speculating about the airstrike etc, is pointless at the moment. Although I guess it would give some indication as to the rest of the US team. That tactic would be better used towards mid/end-game imo.Ong Xuan Giang wrote:Dang Huu Thu wrote:Ong Xuan Giang wrote:Dang Huu Thu wrote:Im just looking forward to when the vigilante kills himself
Thats a thankless role really, 3 bullets but shit scared to use any of them at this stage
USA Leader will also expose himself when he uses the Air Strike, especially if 2 of the victims have 4 voters between them. The Leader must then be the player who voted immediately before the first victim, worse case scenario we can narrow him down to one of 4 possibilities.
Its a hard role tbs.
Why will the USA leader expose himself? Air support isn't called in in the thread, he can just email it in.
Its not announced in the thread but from the rules
"3 of next 6 voters killed by RNG. Not announced in thread."
I took that to mean 3 of the next 6 voters after he has voted otherwise where will the Admin know when the next 6 voters start?
Ly Huu Son wrote:Guys, can I have a consensus? Do you think I should reveal the two that I looked at last night and showed as good or not?
Dang Huu Thu wrote:From the time from when he emailed it in?
Co Thao wrote:
So I think we can start looking at people that were "saved" by votes towards the end, and similarly anyone who was "bussed" assuming we get a decent result in the lynchings when they are announced.
Han Xuan Phuoc wrote:I'm sure the village elder is now delighted with the anonymous roles
Chung Duc Tho wrote:Han Xuan Phuoc wrote:I'm sure the village elder is now delighted with the anonymous roles
That's a problem with the anonymous format, it just encourages Everyone Everything Stupid.
Just as well the Vig is a suicide Vig, otherwise he'd be machine-gunning us all from Night One.
Last edited by Tang Duc on Wed Dec 17, 2014 1:57 pm; edited 2 times in total
Dang Huu Thu wrote:Its such a stupid move Im wondering if he was turned Night 1.
Admins:
a) Are we told of of any turnings
b) Does the special lose their ability if turned?
Bui Huu Khan wrote:Posting the bleeding obvious...then trying to instigate a bandwagon.Ly Huu Son wrote:Bad night for sure. We lost an Angel and the bad guys didn't take each other out.
At this point I think targetting people who have only posted to vote and nothing else is the way to go.
Force them to get involved.
Ly Huu SonThao Dinh Huy wrote:Right, do we have a list of some English translations of the names? Might contain some kind of clues... Even though they can be so wildly different based on how they're interpreted.
Trying way too hard to be helpful but leading us up a blind alley...quite obviously.
Thao Dinh Huy
Ly Huu Son wrote:Should I not have a dead chat invite?
Great insight there.Co Thao wrote:That Elder move >> any of the vig moves in any other game.. Its a pretty useful skill to have but to use it in round 1 on a gambit.. i mean thats a tough school.
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|