Right, let's throw some shit and see what sticks.
Thao Dinh Huy - based on the theory that our dearly departed Seer would've voted for his identified US baddie before popping it, to leave a trail in case he died. Not only that, Thao Dinh Huy also slipped out of the noose on Day 2 in suspicious circumstances, as a few of us (including myself) picked up on in the thread.
Lo Cong Duong - for talking lots but saying nothing. It was this mealy-mouthed post which set the alarm bells ringing...
Lo Cong Duong wrote:I for one believe in our good doctor (referring to Ong Ngoc Huynh), so my first vote is the same as his first
I HATE posts like this. If you're going to tell us that you believe someone, tell us why. Compare this with Hue Cong Loc:
Hue Cong Loc wrote:I thought the original vote made sense, but the flood of votes after were a bit suspicious. That's what stood out to me.
I don't necessarily thing he was being bandwaggoned out of nowhere, but he was being bandwaggoned. Does that make sense?
See that? Clear, reasoned and reasonable.
Point is, as a villager you need reason and logic to believe that someone is good or bad. As a wolf, you don't - you already know - so you don't need to put that extra legwork in to fill in the blanks (hence I currently think Hue Cong Loc is GOOD).
After raising an eyebrow at that post I had a look through his others, 17 in total. They're a garbled collection of truisms and clichés. Some examples:
Lo Cong Duong wrote:Yeah the names have certainly made it so people have to pay attention to what is happening. The wolves are having an easy time of it so far with being able to communicate with each other, whereas the village is pretty much stumbling about blind.
Lo Cong Duong wrote:Most people are watching, very few participating so far. If this continues then the village will lose very quickly.
Lo Cong Duong wrote:Unlike most people who seem to be content to hide in the background and just vote for whoever is being pushed for that round
I ask you, what does this add by way of analysis? What does this actually contribute?
Lo Cong Duong - you seem like a decent bloke, and if you have good intentions, I'm sorry. I just don't see any depth to your posts and something feels a bit off.